More U.S. farmers are considering a shift to biological crop inputs as public figures such as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have voiced concerns regarding chemical use, influencing consumer awareness. Although the scientific community continues to investigate, little evidence exists to support this concern.

For decades, chemical fertilizers and pesticides maximized yields. This has fueled U.S. agricultural dominance. However, rising environmental and health concerns are leading to increased interest in “biologicals.” These products are made from living organisms or natural materials and perform similar functions as synthetic chemicals. Major agribusinesses are investing heavily in the sector, with global biologicals revenue projected to grow from $15 billion to $25 billion by 2030. Despite this enthusiasm, challenges remain. Farmers are cautious about shifting away from reliable chemicals like glyphosate. There are concerns that biologicals may not match their effectiveness.

Many biological products have also suffered from a “snake oil” reputation due to past overhyped claims and poor regulation. Still, industry experts see potential. They note biologicals are reaching parity with chemicals in some areas, such as Brazil’s use of biologicals to control nematodes.

Many producers stress the need for a gradual transition supported by science and results. With innovation, investment and shifting public sentiment, biologicals may soon become standard in U.S. agriculture.

Read more about the increased use of biological crop inputs here.